Free Sholom Rubashkin!

Bill Anderson has an excellent piece on this case today:

This week, Sholom Rubashkin, who was the vice-president of what was once the largest kosher meat processing supplier in the world, was sentenced to 27 years federal prison for "financial fraud." Prosecutors had asked for 25 years, and this is essentially a life sentence for Rubashkin, who is 51. However, a lot of other people, including a number of former U.S. attorneys general, called for leniency and are outraged by this sentence that was motivated more by politics and not by the law.

I will go against all of them. Sholom Rubashkin, in my view, does not need "leniency." He needs to be freed, period, for the man is not a criminal, which is more than I can say for the people who hounded and prosecuted him and destroyed his business, Glatt kosher Agriprocessors of Postville, Iowa. Let me begin.

Rubashkin is a Hasidic Jew, his family having fled the U.S.S.R. after the Nazi invasion. They came to the United States and set up a butcher shop in New York City. After marriage in 1989, he and his new bride moved to Atlanta on shlihut to do kiruv (Jewish outreach). That same year, Rubashkin’s father started a kosher meat processing business in Postville to better enable Jews living outside of main Jewish centers to be able to obtain kosher meat.

Before Glatt kosher Agriprocessors began to expand its business, Jewish families could only purchase kosher meat from small butchers and specialty stores that catered to Jews. This made things more difficult for Jewish families who did not leave near these kinds of stores, but by expanding the amount of kosher meat for sale, the firm was able to bring kosher meat to regular grocery stores, which was not a small development for jewish families.

Read more.

The market for news

Cross-posted at the Mises Economics Blog: http://blog.mises.org/13055/the-market-for-news/

Historically, newspapers have made money in two ways. They make money from readers, and they make money from advertisers. Originally, most of the money that newspapers made came from readers. In the late 19th century and early 20th century the old newsboy sales model was based on incentives to move as many newspapers as possible at the highest possible price. Advertising was a source of revenue, to be sure, but not the primary source.

Over time, the emphasis would shift away from revenue provided by readers and toward advertiser revenue. Eventually, advertiser revenue would make up at least 70-80 percent of all revenue. Essentially, newspapers gave up on getting the readers to cover the full cost of the news a long time ago. The daily cost of a newspaper subscription is, more often than not, well below the cost of producing a paper copy of a newspaper. Until the last few years, the real money was to be made in advertiser dollars.

But with the significant decline in circulation (see here) advertisers know that they get less bang for their buck every month that circulation drops.

So, one day, after years of plummeting circulation and revenue, the newspapers suddenly realized they'd better get the readers to start paying for the news. Their most brilliant ideas revolved around erecting pay walls around content. In other words, the newspapers, to solve their revenue problem, returned to a revenue model that hadn't been used in decades. It hasn't been working out.

Mashable today carried a nice piece on some newspapers that are finally starting to look at innovative ways to make money. Primarily, they're finding ways new ways to make money off of advertisers.

The new innovation that some papers are showing results from the fact that some papers are finally starting to come to grips with reality. The new reality is that news can and will be produced without traditional newspapers.

For the last several years, the entire business model of the newspapers seemed to be "you'll miss us when we're gone, so give us money," which wasn't a rock-solid strategy to say the least.

But other organizations have already moved in to displace them. As the Mashable article notes, laid off journalists from closed and downsized papers have started to produce their own news. Here in Denver, at least one online newspaper aggregates news from a variety of blogs written by former newspaper writers and other bloggers. The blogs are sometimes funded by private firms, such as in the case of this real estate blog.

It has become clear that journalism will be funded, but that the new reality is far more decentralized, complex, and competitive.

The days are gone when one could ask "did you read the paper today" and everyone could discuss the same few news stories selected by even fewer news editors. Today, people can get the news they want, and different people are interested in different things. The market loves this kind of diversity and will move in to serve it in even more diverse ways.

The market is currently in transition, and transitions in the market produce winners and losers, but we're not sure yet who the big winners are in this. The losers are already pretty obvious. Capital needs to be moved to where it is demanded. That is to say, it will be moved away from physical printing presses and old-timey newspapers and toward new innovative leaders in delivering news. Some newspaper organizations will get learn to make money from this, and many will not.

Uh-oh, bigots don't like me

There's a web site called VDARE which many corporate web-surfing programs block for "racist content." They're a site that spins a variety of bizarre theories about the inferiority of non-Anglo Saxons and so on. Articles criticizing me for my moderately pro-immigration views have appeared more than once. On this site, a writer seems to (or at least did at one time) attribute to me the famous "Go back to Boston" tirade by Augustin Cebada of the Brown Berets. Comments that are a bit fiery for my tastes, and somewhat violent and in poor taste. And, I never wrote them. [Here is the original piece, although I don't want to link directly to such a site: http://www.vdare.com/misc/080514_pendleton.htm]

This is simply an occupational hazard of writing a lot, I suppose, since sooner or later, someone would attribute something to me that I never wrote. In my original posting in which I quote (without endorsement) Cebada's views, I did point out the hypocrisy of those who claim to be so horrified by such a statement, while supporting similar sentiments in favor of Anglos. My piece is basically a historical analysis, which is why I compare modern sentiments to those of John C. Calhoun, although for some people, everything is a cause for histrionics. [Here's the archived link, since my old blog posts prior to 2007 have been deleted.]

Which brings me to why I ever brought this up. The "racialists" (as they call themselves) who support these hyper-nationalistic views have twice now hurled insults at me in the comments section of the Mises Economics blog. Personally, I find it rather bizarre that some people have so much free time as to sit around starting fights over articles that were published 4 years ago. But there's a lot of variety out there I suppose.

Flat is the new 'up'

With the next several years looking quite grim, it seems that just neutral economic news will be good news.

From the Aurora Sentinel today:

Higher earners far from immune on foreclosure

AURORA | Not a single economic class or neighborhood in Aurora is immune to foreclosures.

Although foreclosures are more saturated in low-income neighborhoods, they are also dispersed throughout middle- and high-income neighborhoods, according to 2009 data from Arapahoe County.

Until recently, foreclosures were most prevalent in lower-income neighborhoods, among homeowners who were living paycheck to paycheck, afflicted with job losses and unable to pay their mortgages.

But as high unemployment persists and the aftermath of the recession continues to ripple across the state, wealthier neighborhoods with higher-income homeowners are becoming vulnerable to foreclosures as well.

Although the Arapahoe County Assessor’s office doesn’t track the incomes of people who have been affected by foreclosures, they do track the prices of homes that have been foreclosed upon.

Judging by those statistics, it’s evident that the rate of foreclosures has jumped from 2009 to 2010 in all levels of home prices — and, presumably in all economic classes.

*
“Every category did increase,” said Corbin Sakdol, Arapahoe County Assessor. “However, the heavy foreclosures are still in the $250,000 and below range.”

Since January, there were about 1,300 foreclosed homes in Arapahoe County in the price range of $250,000 and below, up from about 1,000 from January to June of 2009, Sakdol said.

In the price range of $250,000 to $500,000, there have been about 160 foreclosed homes since January, up from about 110 foreclosures in the same period of 2009.

The trend continues all the way up to the homes in the price range of $1 million and above. In that range, there have been 16 foreclosed homes since January, up from 11 in the same period of 2009.

Aurora still has the highest number of foreclosures out of any area in Arapahoe County, Sakdol said.

But data from the state of Colorado’s Division of Housing show that foreclosures are trending away from Aurora and into counties such as Jefferson, Douglas and Boulder.

“The fact that foreclosures have become more numerous in places like Douglas and Jefferson indicates that foreclosures are moving up the income scale,” said Ryan McMaken, community relations director for the state of Colorado’s Division of Housing. “We’re seeing movement in foreclosures toward areas that have more expensive homes, whereas they used to be centered in Denver, Adams, Arapahoe, and especially in Aurora.”

Foreclosures are quick to impact those people without college degrees, who most likely haven’t built coffers of savings to sustain them through a lull of unemployment, he said. That explains why the number of foreclosures were originally most concentrated in places like Adams County and Arapahoe County.

But since late 2008, as homeowners in high-income neighborhoods have slowly run out of money because of unemployment, they are now in the same position as those lower-income homeowners.

“The length of time that unemployment has been high is now starting to affect people with higher incomes because they are running out of savings,” McMaken said. “But people toward the lower end of the income scale are most impacted by the recession.”

Recent data suggests that the rate of people going into foreclosure statewide, including in Aurora, has reached a plateau.

McMaken said last month’s figures show the lowest foreclosure filings for counties since May 2009.

“Flat is the new ‘up’ in terms of good economic news,” he said. “Flat is what you like to see. Rather than foreclosures going up, if they can just stay flat for a while then you’re happy about that, and that seems to be what we’re looking at right now.”

#2 of ten things to not Tweet about

I especially enjoyed this one:



Translation: I don't have any actual knowledge about any actual industries. I just like to communicate about communications.

From The Oatmeal

More economic pain ahead

From my post at Libertarianstandard.com:

In the chart below, provided by chartoftheday.com, one can see how grim the job situation has become. The long term-trend experienced since 1961 has been abandoned for what can only be described as stagnation in job creation. As jobs remain flat, of course, the size of the job force will continue to grow as more young people graduate from college and secondary school. This is partly why unemployment among teens and twentysomethings is now about 25 percent.



According to chartoftheday.com:

Today, the Labor Department reported that nonfarm payrolls increased by 431,000 in May. It is worth noting that a large majority of last month's gain in payrolls was due to the hiring of temporary workers for the 2010 census. Today's chart provides some perspective on the US job market. Note how the number of jobs steadily increased from 1961 to 2001 (top chart). During the last economic recovery, however, job growth was unable to get back up to its long-term trend (first time since 1961). More recently, nonfarm payrolls have pulled away from its 40-year trend (1961-2001) by a record percentage (bottom chart). In fact, the number of US jobs is currently at level first reached in early 2000.

So far, the current "recovery" has produced a net loss of 133,000 jobs. During the same point in the last recovery (2003), the economy was adding 200,000 to 300,000 jobs per month. Calling the current situation a recovery is risible to anyone who is out looking for a job right now, especially since workers are now experiencing the longest periods of joblessness experienced in decades.

We can add to this the fact that the debt crisis in Europe has now spread to Hungary. So now, Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Spain and Hungary are all now facing serious debt crises and even risk of default. The European economy is in disarray, and investors were not pleased as the Dow plunged more than 300 points to below 10,000.

The homebuyer tax credits are gone, the stimulus is beginning to wear off, and there is nothing left that the feds can do to stave off another crisis since interest rates are already effectively zero and the federal government is more more broke than ever. State and local governments are in even worse shape.

Needless to say, this does not bode well for the "recovery."

New economics haikus

Here are a couple of haikus by economists I know. I didn't credit them because I'm too lazy to ask them, and it's easier to just cut and paste. Note: If you want me to credit you, just shoot me an email.

Helicopters fueled
Bernanke begins his flight
Paper-rain cuts me

also

Too much bank credit
Plans cannot be completed
Recession follows

I'll post any good new ones...

Good analysis on GDP growth.

All those big growth numbers above 5 percent come from manufacturing to replace burned off inventory. There's little actual growth. Oh, and there's zero employment growth.

This piece is helpful except for this statement: "As this remains a jobless recovery, it must therefore become a consumer spending recovery." That doesn't follow at all. This attitude only results in consumers going more deeply into debt. Just because the American economy is currently driven by consumer spending doesn't mean that has to be true. The economy could just as easily be based on saving and investment rather than on purchasing shiny trinkets.

But, as long as the Fed continues to ram down interest rates, consumers will prefer spending to saving.

My talk in Aspen

I was recently on an economics panel at the Aspen Board of Realtors' Economic Summit. The Aspen Daily news did a write-up.

Foreclosure filings up dramatically
by Catherine Lutz, Aspen Daily News Staff Writer
Monday, March 15, 2010

Expert: Locals in resort areas getting hit hard

Foreclosure filings in Pitkin County are more than triple what they were in early March last year, mirroring a disturbing trend in which experts are seeing rural resort regions getting hit harder later in the economic downturn.

There have been 22 foreclosure filings so far in Pitkin County in 2010, compared to six at the same time last year, according to treasurer’s office records.

Delinquent amounts range from under $100,000 to $1.5 million, and there doesn’t seem to be any rhyme or reason to the types of foreclosures being filed, said Tiffany Wancura, chief deputy public trustee for Pitkin County.

“They’re all over the place,” said Wancura. “They just keep coming in.”

A scan of the foreclosures list shows that mostly individuals and couples are affected, as opposed to LLCs, which tend to own commercial properties and oftentimes more expensive, second homes.

Pitkin County saw a total of 105 foreclosure filings in 2009, out of which 20 properties went all the way through to the foreclosure sale. It was the third highest number of foreclosures since 1973. (Records are unavailable before that.) By comparison, 2008 saw 35 foreclosure filings and five completed foreclosures in Pitkin County.

An economist who works for the state government addressed the issue of rising foreclosures recently at the Aspen Board of Realtors’ real estate summit.

Some resort regions saw 40-60 percent foreclosure rates two years ago, said Ryan McMaken, director of community relations for the Colorado Division of Housing. That’s when vacation home owners, initially hit by the economist crisis, were choosing to jettison their timeshares or other investment properties as values plummeted by simply not paying the mortgage. Owner occupants, meanwhile, qualified for a federal foreclosure deferment program, which saved many people from foreclosure sales.

But now, “local owners are losing their jobs or otherwise seeing a decline in income, so over time locals are impacted more and more,” said McMaken, an economist.

In the rural resort regions of Colorado, McMaken said, both new foreclosure filings and completed foreclosures are going up, and in some places are doubling and tripling since last year.

“It’s because places like this got hit later,” he said. “And it adds to the pain lasting.”

Statewide, data is not yet available for 2010. But trends from 2009 show that while foreclosure filings increased — there were 18 percent more in 2009 than in 2008 — foreclosure sales decreased by 4 percent.

These trends indicate that “lenders, borrowers and housing counselors are meeting success in implementing a variety of loss mitigation strategies,” according to a report from the state Department of Local Affairs. “However, the increase in new foreclosure filings indicates that foreclosure activity will continue in Colorado at least through the first half of 2010.”

The DOLA report also notes that “most of the new growth in foreclosure activity is taking place outside of the Denver Metro area.”

Foreclosure filings have risen across Colorado nearly every year since 2003, according to state data, with a big spike in 2007. Filings rose to 39,900 that year, from 28,400 in 2006. They went down just slightly in 2008, to 39,300, but rose again, to 46,400, in 2009.

Foreclosure sales have been decreasing since 2007, when there was a high of 25,000 completed foreclosures.

Both foreclosure filings and sales are roughly triple what they were in 2003.

The largest amount of foreclosure activity last year was taking place on the Front Range, even though some metro counties are seeing the biggest drops in foreclosure sales totals.

Mesa County (home to Grand Junction), on the other hand, saw about 300 percent more foreclosure filings and sales in the fourth quarter of 2009, compared to the same period in 2008 — likely due to the decrease in oil and gas activity. Otherwise, foreclosure rates (number of homes per completed foreclosure) have generally been lower in the mountains and on the Western Slope, according to DOLA.

Pitkin County’s foreclosure rate in 2009 was .3 percent, which translates to 393 households per completed foreclosure, among the lowest in the state. Garfield County had 408 foreclosure filings in 2009, and 82 foreclosure sales. That’s compared to 108 filings and 10 sales in 2008. Still, its 2009 foreclosure rate was .4 percent, compared to the state average of 1.1 percent.

Locally, it’s unknown how many of the foreclosure filings will translate into sales at auction. The first scheduled foreclosure sale of the 2010 filings in Pitkin County is May 12.

Meanwhile, banks that have been acquiring more and more property due to foreclosures are doing everything they can to avoid future foreclosure sales.

If a foreclosure sale goes through, there are additional costs to the bank, including legal fees, property taxes and the time spent by staff, said Scott Gordon, president of Alpine Bank Aspen.

“The bills add up pretty quick,” said Gordon.

Gordon also pointed out that property values have been low recently, and while the bank may prefer to hold the property for a couple years in hopes of better recouping costs when the market goes up, federal regulators want them to sell it sooner rather than later.

“We’re not in the business of buying and selling real estate; that’s not apart of our core business model,” he said.

Gordon said that it’s to everyone’s advantage to try to negotiate avoiding a foreclosure sale.

“Strategically the best thing you can do is to find what the borrower and the bank can work out,” he said. “If you have some level of income coming in, the last thing you want to do is not have a conversation with your bank.”

CBS4 Promotions

The Foreclosure Hotline communications guru (Sarah Noel) and I helped put together a nice little partnership between the Colorado Association of Realtors and the Foreclosure Hotline that has led to a series of spots on CBS4 featuring foreclosure issues and homeownership. They can be viewed here.

February 2010 Housing Snapshot

Housing Snapshot is a very brief summary of the housing economy in Colorado. It's 4 pages of short articles and graphs covering mostly job growth and housing demand, and the housing markets in general.

Here's February's issue.

The latest Case-Shiller index data

In case you're looking for it, here's the link to the latest Case-Shiller home price index data.